↓ Skip to main content

Global models for radio-frequency ion thrusters

Overview of attention for article published in EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Global models for radio-frequency ion thrusters
Published in
EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation, July 2021
DOI 10.1140/epjti/s40485-021-00068-5
Authors

Patrick Dietz, Andreas Reeh, Konstantin Keil, Kristof Holste, Uwe Probst, Peter J. Klar, Chris Volkmar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 50%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation
#48
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,199
of 438,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.