| Title |
Termiticidal activity of wood vinegar, its components and their homologues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, August 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00831357 |
| Authors |
Mitsuyoshi Yatagai, Madoka Nishimoto, Keko Hori, Tatsuro Ohira, Akira Shibata |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 26% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#236
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,211
of 49,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.