↓ Skip to main content

Creating idiometric short-form measures of cognitive appraisal: balancing theory and pragmatics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Creating idiometric short-form measures of cognitive appraisal: balancing theory and pragmatics
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41687-021-00317-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn E. Schwartz, Roland B. Stark, Bruce D. Rapkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#314
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,622
of 436,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#19
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.