| Title |
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-021-00400-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark E. Nunnally, Ricard Ferrer, Greg S. Martin, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Flavia R. Machado, Daniel De Backer, Craig M. Coopersmith, Clifford S. Deutschman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 65% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,097,758
of 25,203,135 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#21
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,013
of 434,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,203,135 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.