| Title |
Energetic dysfunction in sepsis: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00893-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastien Preau, Dominique Vodovar, Boris Jung, Steve Lancel, Lara Zafrani, Aurelien Flatres, Mehdi Oualha, Guillaume Voiriot, Youenn Jouan, Jeremie Joffre, Fabrice Uhel, Nicolas De Prost, Stein Silva, Eric Azabou, Peter Radermacher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 20 | 23% |
| Spain | 6 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#813,239
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#85
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,764
of 455,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.