↓ Skip to main content

Selecting critical features for data classification based on machine learning methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Big Data, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
397 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
764 Mendeley
Title
Selecting critical features for data classification based on machine learning methods
Published in
Journal of Big Data, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40537-020-00327-4
Authors

Rung-Ching Chen, Christine Dewi, Su-Wen Huang, Rezzy Eko Caraka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 764 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 764 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 10%
Student > Bachelor 41 5%
Lecturer 39 5%
Researcher 35 5%
Other 88 12%
Unknown 401 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 130 17%
Engineering 75 10%
Unspecified 14 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Environmental Science 12 2%
Other 106 14%
Unknown 413 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,062,102
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#178
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,249
of 400,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.