↓ Skip to main content

Replacing critical point drying with a low-cost chemical drying provides comparable surface image quality of glandular trichomes from leaves of Millingtonia hortensis L. f. in scanning electron…

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microscopy, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Replacing critical point drying with a low-cost chemical drying provides comparable surface image quality of glandular trichomes from leaves of Millingtonia hortensis L. f. in scanning electron micrograph
Published in
Applied Microscopy, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42649-020-00035-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raktim Bhattacharya, Sulagna Saha, Olga Kostina, Lyudmila Muravnik, Adinpunya Mitra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Engineering 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 23 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microscopy
#23
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,973
of 413,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microscopy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.