| Title |
Diaphragm dysfunction, lung aeration loss and weaning-induced pulmonary oedema in difficult-to-wean patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00886-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Dres, Emmanuel Rozenberg, Elise Morawiec, Julien Mayaux, Julie Delemazure, Thomas Similowski, Alexandre Demoule |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 8 | 17% |
| Argentina | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Chile | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 47% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,273,354
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#143
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,432
of 444,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.