| Title |
Effects of Colistin and Bacteriocins Combinations on the In Vitro Growth of Escherichia coli Strains from Swine Origin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12602-016-9227-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed K. Al Atya, Hikmate Abriouel, Isabelle Kempf, Eric Jouy, Eric Auclair, Anne Vachée, Djamel Drider |
| Abstract |
Escherichia coli strains from swine origin, either susceptible or resistant to colistin, were grown under planktonic and biofilm cultures. After which, they were treated with antibacterial agents including nisin and enterocin DD14 bacteriocins, colistin and their combinations. Importantly, the combination of colistin, enterocin DD14 and nisin eradicated the planktonic and biofilm cultures of E. coli CIP54127 and the E. coli strains with colistin-resistance phenotype such as E. coli 184 (mcr-1 (+)) and E. coli 289 (mcr-1 (-)), suggesting therefore that bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria could be used as agents with antibiotic augmentation capability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#234
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,914
of 341,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.