↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative comparison of data-driven gating and external hardware gating for 18F-FDG PET-MRI in patients with esophageal tumors

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Hybrid Imaging, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative comparison of data-driven gating and external hardware gating for 18F-FDG PET-MRI in patients with esophageal tumors
Published in
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41824-021-00099-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofia Kvernby, Nafsika Korsavidou Hult, Elin Lindström, Jonathan Sigfridsson, Gustav Linder, Jakob Hedberg, Håkan Ahlström, Tomas Bjerner, Mark Lubberink

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
#34
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,379
of 429,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.