Title |
Do a Law’s Policy Implications Affect Beliefs About Its Constitutionality? An Experimental Test
|
---|---|
Published in |
Law and Human Behavior, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10979-007-9102-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua R. Furgeson, Linda Babcock, Peter M. Shane |
Abstract |
Although a substantial empirical literature has found associations between judges' political orientation and their judicial decisions, the nature of the relationship between policy preferences and constitutional reasoning remains unclear. In this experimental study, law students were asked to determine the constitutionality of a hypothetical law, where the policy implications of the law were manipulated while holding all legal evidence constant. The data indicate that, even with an incentive to select the ruling best supported by the legal evidence, liberal participants were more likely to overturn laws that decreased taxes than laws that increased taxes. The opposite pattern held for conservatives. The experimental manipulation significantly affected even those participants who believed their policy preferences had no influence on their constitutional decisions. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 30% |
Researcher | 4 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 11 | 55% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |