↓ Skip to main content

The engine initiating tissue regeneration: does a common mechanism exist during evolution?

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
The engine initiating tissue regeneration: does a common mechanism exist during evolution?
Published in
Cell Regeneration, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13619-020-00073-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanmei Liu, Wilson Pak-Kin Lou, Ji-Feng Fei

Abstract

A successful tissue regeneration is a very complex process that requires a precise coordination of many molecular, cellular and physiological events. One of the critical steps is to convert the injury signals into regeneration signals to initiate tissue regeneration. Although many efforts have been made to investigate the mechanisms triggering tissue regeneration, the fundamental questions remain unresolved. One of the major obstacles is that the injury and the initiation of regeneration are two highly coupled processes and hard to separate from one another. In this article, we review the major events occurring at the early injury/regeneration stage in a range of species, and discuss the possible common mechanisms during initiation of tissue regeneration.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#17,303,862
of 21,418,190 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#108
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,032
of 342,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,418,190 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them