↓ Skip to main content

Complicated embolisation of late endoleak via direct sac puncture: not all endoleaks are a type II endoleak

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Complicated embolisation of late endoleak via direct sac puncture: not all endoleaks are a type II endoleak
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42155-021-00237-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aizat Drahman, Diederick Willem De Boo, Barry Springthorpe, Arvind Deshpande

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,297,447
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#240
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,885
of 448,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.