Title |
Potential utilization of bagasse as feed material for earthworm Eisenia fetida and production of vermicompost
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40064-014-0780-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sartaj Ahmad Bhat, Jaswinder Singh, Adarsh Pal Vig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
Researcher | 13 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 17% |
Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 24% |
Environmental Science | 20 | 16% |
Engineering | 9 | 7% |
Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 40 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#944
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,300
of 355,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#44
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.