↓ Skip to main content

Analytical protocols for Phobos regolith samples returned by the Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Analytical protocols for Phobos regolith samples returned by the Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40623-021-01438-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wataru Fujiya, Yoshihiro Furukawa, Haruna Sugahara, Mizuho Koike, Ken-ichi Bajo, Nancy L. Chabot, Yayoi N. Miura, Frederic Moynier, Sara S. Russell, Shogo Tachibana, Yoshinori Takano, Tomohiro Usui, Michael E. Zolensky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 15%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,410,132
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#243
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,545
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.