| Title |
Left ventricular longitudinal wall fractional shortening accurately predicts longitudinal strain in critically ill patients with septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00840-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrik Johansson Blixt, Michelle S. Chew, Rasmus Åhman, Lina de Geer, Lill Blomqwist, Meriam Åström Aneq, Jan Engvall, Henrik Andersson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#977
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#366,265
of 431,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#38
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.