| Title |
Faculty as reflective practitioners in emergency online teaching: an autoethnography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-021-00261-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Insung Jung, Sawa Omori, Walter P. Dawson, Tomiko Yamaguchi, Seunghun J. Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 72% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 27% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,438,516
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#81
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,313
of 437,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.