| Title |
Virtual reality vs. Kalinox® for management of pain in intensive care unit after cardiac surgery: a randomized study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00866-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Driss Laghlam, Cecile Naudin, Lucas Coroyer, Vincent Aidan, Julien Malvy, Ghilas Rahoual, Philippe Estagnasié, Pierre Squara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#14,591,723
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#794
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,967
of 434,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#33
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.