↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: SAPS 3 score as a predictive factor for postoperative referral to intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: SAPS 3 score as a predictive factor for postoperative referral to intensive care unit
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-016-0180-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

João M. Silva, Helder Marcus Costa Rocha, Henrique Tadashi Katayama, Leandro Ferreira Dias, Mateus Barros de Paula, Leusi Magda Romano Andraus, Jose Maria Correa Silva, Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,377,336
of 8,229,276 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#265
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,476
of 252,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,229,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.