| Title |
Method of respiratory rate measurement using a unique wearable platform and an adaptive optical-based approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-020-00302-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gurpreet Singh, Augustine Tee, Thanawin Trakoolwilaiwan, Aza Taha, Malini Olivo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Italy | 3 | 12% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,704,534
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#72
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,741
of 393,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.