↓ Skip to main content

Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Bioresources and Bioprocessing, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 162)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
985 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1786 Mendeley
Title
Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review
Published in
Bioresources and Bioprocessing, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40643-017-0137-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adepu Kiran Kumar, Shaishav Sharma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,786 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1786 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 256 14%
Student > Bachelor 245 14%
Student > Master 239 13%
Researcher 149 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 86 5%
Other 224 13%
Unknown 587 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 242 14%
Engineering 182 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 179 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 131 7%
Chemistry 129 7%
Other 221 12%
Unknown 702 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#43
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,011
of 428,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.