Title |
Retrospective evaluation of intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia during labor
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00540-011-1292-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuki Hosokawa, Hiroshi Morisaki, Itsuo Nakatsuka, Saori Hashiguchi, Kei Miyakoshi, Mamoru Tanaka, Yasunori Yoshimura, Junzo Takeda |
Abstract |
Because the safety of intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (iv-PCA) administered during labor remains unclear, we retrospectively examined the labor records from January 2005 to December 2007 in our institution, with a focus on both maternal and neonatal outcomes, as compared to no analgesia. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 61% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#166
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,931
of 241,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.