↓ Skip to main content

Convolutional neural networks for the diagnosis and prognosis of the coronavirus disease pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Convolutional neural networks for the diagnosis and prognosis of the coronavirus disease pandemic
Published in
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42492-021-00078-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sneha Kugunavar, C. J. Prabhakar

Abstract

A neural network is one of the current trends in deep learning, which is increasingly gaining attention owing to its contribution in transforming the different facets of human life. It also paves a way to approach the current crisis caused by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from all scientific directions. Convolutional neural network (CNN), a type of neural network, is extensively applied in the medical field, and is particularly useful in the current COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we present the application of CNNs for the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 using X-ray and computed tomography (CT) images of COVID-19 patients. The CNN models discussed in this review were mainly developed for the detection, classification, and segmentation of COVID-19 images. The base models used for detection and classification were AlexNet, Visual Geometry Group Network with 16 layers, residual network, DensNet, GoogLeNet, MobileNet, Inception, and extreme Inception. U-Net and voxel-based broad learning network were used for segmentation. Even with limited datasets, these methods proved to be beneficial for efficiently identifying the occurrence of COVID-19. To further validate these observations, we conducted an experimental study using a simple CNN framework for the binary classification of COVID-19 CT images. We achieved an accuracy of 93% with an F1-score of 0.93. Thus, with the availability of improved medical image datasets, it is evident that CNNs are very useful for the efficient diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Lecturer 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 36 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 38 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,763,735
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art
#7
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,936
of 453,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 41 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them