↓ Skip to main content

Techniques to Obtain Good Resolution and Concentrated Time-Frequency Distributions: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Techniques to Obtain Good Resolution and Concentrated Time-Frequency Distributions: A Review
Published in
ADS, June 2009
DOI 10.1155/2009/673539
Authors

Imran Shafi, Jamil Ahmad, Syed Ismail Shah, F. M. Kashif

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 32%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 45%
Computer Science 6 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,327
of 25,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,701
of 123,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#86
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.