| Title |
The possible use of surian tree (Toona sinensis Roem) branches as an alternative raw material in the production of composite boards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s10086-020-01871-6 |
| Authors |
Eka Mulya Alamsyah, Sutrisno, Ihak Sumardi, Atmawi Darwis, Yoyo Suhaya, Yayat Hidayat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#173
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,880
of 373,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.