@IanDunt This paper puts the net present value of low carbon investments at $16.6 trillion by 2050 https://t.co/KzcEwVsyFE. It's nonsense that we need to wait for China to achieve any benefits from cleaner air and greater energy security.
RT @AdiGaskell: @DeborahMeaden This paper puts the net present value of low carbon investments at $16.6 trillion by 2050 https://t.co/KzcEw…
RT @AdiGaskell: @DeborahMeaden This paper puts the net present value of low carbon investments at $16.6 trillion by 2050 https://t.co/KzcEw…
@DeborahMeaden This paper puts the net present value of low carbon investments at $16.6 trillion by 2050 https://t.co/KzcEwVsyFE. It's a fallacy that protecting our planet is bad economically.
Low-carbon cities are a $17 trillion opportunity. https://t.co/h0hQyk5H3V #openaccess https://t.co/RVVOYnFQrJ
RT @s_colenbrander: Low-carbon cities: is ambitious action affordable? (spoiler: yes!) https://t.co/E4WS9UmUAj #openaccess https://t.co/pt…
Low-carbon cities: is ambitious action affordable? (spoiler: yes!) https://t.co/E4WS9UmUAj #openaccess https://t.co/ptGSUtiF9K
Study on financing climate action in cities says investments could have net present value of $65tn in period to 2050 https://t.co/vDKNqGP9v8
Low carbon cities: is ambitious action affordable? https://t.co/S0zyalrGPi
CC. Low carbon cities: is ambitious action affordable? https://t.co/LLOZesCFhv
CC: Low carbon cities: is ambitious action affordable? https://t.co/sOm6E2NfxF https://t.co/g3zMjGOuWF
Low carbon cities: is ambitious action affordable? https://t.co/4Tj4cGkmvu #climatechange