| Title |
Socioeconomic factors influencing global paper and paperboard demand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10086-017-1648-x |
| Authors |
Taiyo Chiba, Hiroyasu Oka, Chihiro Kayo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Energy | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,832,830
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#21
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,934
of 313,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them