↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of cyclic RGD peptides for αvβ3 integrin detection in a rat model of myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of cyclic RGD peptides for αvβ3 integrin detection in a rat model of myocardial infarction
Published in
EJNMMI Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2191-219x-3-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iina Laitinen, Johannes Notni, Karolin Pohle, Martina Rudelius, Eliane Farrell, Stephan G Nekolla, Gjermund Henriksen, Stefanie Neubauer, Horst Kessler, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Markus Schwaiger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Chemistry 11 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#174
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,124
of 205,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.