| Title |
Comparison of the CO-RADS and the RSNA chest CT classification system concerning sensitivity and reliability for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-021-00998-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Abdel-Tawab, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Ibrahim A. I. Mohamed, Hamdy M. Ibrahim, Mohamed M. A. Zaitoun, Saeed Bakry Elsayed, Nader E. M. Mahmoud, Ahmed A. El Sammak, Hala Y. Yousef, Sameh Abdelaziz Aly, Hamada M. Khater, Walid Mosallam, Waleed S. Abo Shanab, Ali M. Hendi, Sayed Hassan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#21,699,788
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#946
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,359
of 430,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#34
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.