| Title |
Admission criteria and management of critical care patients in a pandemic context: position of the Ethics Commission of the French Intensive Care Society, update of April 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00855-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivier Lesieur, Jean Pierre Quenot, Zoé Cohen-Solal, Raphaëlle David, Laure De Saint Blanquat, Maxime Elbaz, Bénédicte Gaillard Le Roux, Cyril Goulenok, Sylvain Lavoué, Virginie Lemiale, Emmanuelle Mercier, Chaouki Mezher, Benoît Misset, Gwendolyn Penven, Anne Laure Poujol, Bertrand Quentin, Régis Quéré, Thierry Van Der Linden, Jean Philippe Rigaud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#12,927,849
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#667
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,852
of 436,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.