↓ Skip to main content

Accidental administration of the remifentanil formulation Ultiva™ into the epidural space and the complete time course of its consequences: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 230)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Accidental administration of the remifentanil formulation Ultiva™ into the epidural space and the complete time course of its consequences: a case report
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40981-016-0046-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kota Nishimoto, Sachiyo Sakamoto, Makiko Mikami, Kiichi Hirota, Koh Shingu

Abstract

Ultiva™ contains the potent short-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil hydrochloride, and it is commonly administered intravenously during general anesthesia. It is not approved for epidural or intrathecal use in clinical practice because it contains glycine as an acidic buffer. However, at this moment, very limited information is available on epidural administration of Ultiva™. We report the accidental administration of 300 μg of remifentanil and 2.25 mg of glycine into the epidural space after emergence from general anesthesia for distal pancreatectomy and the complete time course of its consequences. The respiratory depression occurred at 5 min after the administration, and complete loss of consciousness was observed at 8 min. The patient was re-intubated and underwent mechanical respiration. At 45 min (33 min after re-intubation), spontaneous respiration resumed, she was responsive to commands, and her orientation returned. She was extubated successfully. These consequences might have resulted from the diffusion of the components of Ultiva™ into not only systemic circulation but also the cerebrospinal fluid. Moreover, the complex pathophysiology might be associated with remifentanil, as well as glycine present in Ultiva™.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Neuroscience 2 15%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,235,383
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#3
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,145
of 379,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them