@BzuiQwdr Autism does not exist. https://t.co/6TEzYaTN4U https://t.co/njcl3jiguc
@HappyJalapeno69 @MilesVitoze18 @ArtaxEffedMeUp @MalesOfReddit Autism does not exist. https://t.co/6TEzYaTN4U https://t.co/njcl3jiguc
@treenuitee Autism does not exist. https://t.co/njcl3jiguc https://t.co/6TEzYaTN4U
@Attract4Real Autism does not exist. https://t.co/njcl3jiguc https://t.co/6TEzYaTN4U
@smolsen Autism is not another type of brain. Autism does not exist. https://t.co/njcl3jiguc https://t.co/6TEzYaTN4U
@Suburbannnn @pot8um Autism does not exist. https://t.co/6TEzYaTN4U https://t.co/njcl3jiguc
Contrary to the position of phony-leftist activists who promote the biological determinist "neurodivergent" conception of psychological disorders like autism (ASD), there is actually no reliable scientific evidence that they are rooted in the brain.
@CulturalRadical @jimmy_dore @PierreKory @jayjoseph22 ASD also lacks biological and construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@MindThisMind @psychgeist52 @jayjoseph22 ASD doesn't even have biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@Rilan_Es @AporiaMatt @BronskiJoseph @AporiaMagazine ASD has no biological or construct validity thought. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@timopennanen Gillberg muuten on kirjoitellut nyttemmin että autismidg pitäisi hajottaa. Ei suinkaan siksi että Gillberg kannattaisi neuromoninaisuusmallia, vaan koska katsoo että diagnoosi nyt vain ei toimi medikaalisen mallin mukaisena. https://t.co/kfN
@spaceangelvoice @charlesmurray @benshapiro ASD isn't construct or biologically valid. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@LapGong I've shown IQ isn't "genetic", Jay Joseph has shown that schizophrenia isn't "genetic", and autism isn't even a valid construct. Hereditarianism fails on conceptual grounds, since there is no privileged level of causation. https://t.co/yXFbGfIaLC
@RVL1389 @oldhamroughyed @SBakerMD ASD lacks biological and construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@leoniedelt @ComradeDoom1 Woah, I didn't realize they were doing research with self-dx, that's ridiculous. Even in 2016 though, one of the mainstream researchers was questioning ASD's validity, so the clinical side is shaky too. https://t.co/V9eMP4pKSw
Unthinkable... https://t.co/BD90mfR5o0
Surprising findings? I don't think so. "The findings reviewed indicate that the ASD diagnosis lacks biological and construct validity" https://t.co/OvOqoLVvfb
@sebatlab Do tell - is this a validation of ASD and does it address the issues with biological and construct validity of ASD as laid out by Waterhouse, London, and Gillberg (2016)? https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@stetson_thacker @jayjoseph22 @RhiannonDauster @vonKriegstein @ThomasMcEvoy19 Re your first paper - ASD isn't biologically or construct valid - what does that mean to you? https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
RT @Race__Realist: Discussion of "The People-Things Dimension" regarding sex diffs, bringing up ASD and Baren-Cohen's work. No discussion o…
@HelgaVarden Not really philosophy, but it shows that ASD isn't construct or biologically valid. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
RT @Race__Realist: @GummiPie @elisekumar I was taught that ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@GummiPie @elisekumar I was taught that ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@magistraetmater @JohnQuiggin Daily reminder that ASD has no construct or biological validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@LapGong All good man. Check this out though. https://t.co/nECC5KIIxf
RT @Race__Realist: @WiringTheBrain ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@WiringTheBrain ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
I think we’ve discovered why RaceRealist resents science in general, and research into IQ and autism in particular.
Too bad ASD lacks biological and construct validity (like IQ!). https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW https://t.co/HEfnIFqbRE
Ah yes. The "disorder" that lacks both biological and construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@Anthony78240063 @jayjoseph22 You gotta try harder than just assume physicalism; ASD has no biological or construct validity; and down syndrome isn't "caused by" genes - it's due to a disrupted system. @DialecticalA https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
ASD lacks construct and biological validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
Ah, yes. ASD which lacks biological and construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
RT @Race__Realist: Discussion of "The People-Things Dimension" regarding sex diffs, bringing up ASD and Baren-Cohen's work. No discussion o…
@bayesianboy Have you seen this? No construct or biological validity for ASD. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@VinniePalazeti ASD has no neurobiological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qionku
@AbhiDhabi5 @sullydish @parul_sehgal Murray says exactly that. https://t.co/XOnpaQ3z38
@WiringTheBrain We know there is no neurobiological or construct validity for ASD: https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
Discussion of "The People-Things Dimension" regarding sex diffs, bringing up ASD and Baren-Cohen's work. No discussion of the fact that there is no neurobiological or construct validity for ASD: https://t.co/pdj3Qionku https://t.co/EJxVFD0Yzm
ASD diagnosis lacks biological and construct validity https://t.co/ds1TJ98hH6
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: @richardmills18 @TweetingAutism More data about what we mean by 'autism' in a clinical/biomarker sense: https://t.co/I…
ASD Validity https://t.co/sqX6fAhCQI
@smith_valence @Eidotheia @EPoe187 The mental is irreducible to the physical; ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@Dr_Phil_K @sapinker @nice_hypothesis ASD lacks biological and construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@slooterman @PubMedOnline Perhaps interesting Not at such about diagnosis. But more about research in autism. " The findings reviewed indicate that the ASD diagnosis lacks biological and construct validity" https://t.co/uqNsOs718I
Diagnósticos del #EspectroAutista: La Evidencia disponible no aporta Pruebas suficientes para la Validez de un constructo Neurobiológico de la Enfermedad https://t.co/faxoEpNIxu
Drawbacks and Benefits of Disbanding Autism spectrum disorder ASD in Research https://t.co/zwXklKmA3D
@AnderRetolaza Este tercero es clave: Drawbacks and Benefits of Disbanding Autism spectrum disorder ASD in Research https://t.co/zwXklKmA3D
@Eastwestmeets @ResistHerd ASD lacks biological and construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@TungstenV @Eastwestmeets @ResistHerd ASD isn't construct valid. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@circuit_logic ASD lacks biological and construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@Steppe_MLBA @pp0196 @gcochran99 @arnoldtohtfan @charlesmurray ASD has no construct or biological validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@LTF_01 @_attlee @PredativePulse ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW "genes implicated in" schizophrenia hardly ever replicate, on top of the slew of other problems related to the "disorder". E.g.: https://t.co/ByJUZRij
@LeftistRight @DocBastard @JohnRMoffitt But the way, ASD doesn't have construct or biological validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@sbaroncohen ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@thomasmurphy__ @NISHIKIPRESTIGE @_____078190 ASD lacks biological and construct validity as well. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@Tallon_1 @4lternate_facts “The findings reviewed indicate that the ASD diagnosis lacks biological and construct validity. The paper concludes with proposals for research going forward.” https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
@YeyoZa @snide_sam ASD has no biological or construct validity. https://t.co/pdj3Qi6MsW
ASD validity https://t.co/ds1TJ98hH6
"The evidence does not provide support for the neurobiological or construct validity of the ASD (autism) diagnosis." https://t.co/xnHr2xr0UC
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: @Feline13579 @leoniedelt It is but some researchers are already leaning in that direction: https://t.co/IlY5vKMcAp
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: The Decline and Fall of "Autism" https://t.co/HjSZfbCUZA by @JillEscher and the Waterhouse paper (open-access) https:/…
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: The Decline and Fall of "Autism" https://t.co/HjSZfbCUZA by @JillEscher and the Waterhouse paper (open-access) https:/…
RT @afcp_01: ギルバーグ達のこのレビュー https://t.co/lcpaopyBEd から始まって、このエディトリアル https://t.co/veByzczEbr に飛ぶ、「自閉スペクトラム症」概念を研究に使うのはそろそろ諦めた方がよいんじゃないのか、という…
RT @afcp_01: ギルバーグ達のこのレビュー https://t.co/lcpaopyBEd から始まって、このエディトリアル https://t.co/veByzczEbr に飛ぶ、「自閉スペクトラム症」概念を研究に使うのはそろそろ諦めた方がよいんじゃないのか、という…
RT @afcp_01: ギルバーグ達のこのレビュー https://t.co/lcpaopyBEd から始まって、このエディトリアル https://t.co/veByzczEbr に飛ぶ、「自閉スペクトラム症」概念を研究に使うのはそろそろ諦めた方がよいんじゃないのか、という…
RT @afcp_01: ギルバーグ達のこのレビュー https://t.co/lcpaopyBEd から始まって、このエディトリアル https://t.co/veByzczEbr に飛ぶ、「自閉スペクトラム症」概念を研究に使うのはそろそろ諦めた方がよいんじゃないのか、という…
RT @afcp_01: ギルバーグ達のこのレビュー https://t.co/lcpaopyBEd から始まって、このエディトリアル https://t.co/veByzczEbr に飛ぶ、「自閉スペクトラム症」概念を研究に使うのはそろそろ諦めた方がよいんじゃないのか、という…
ギルバーグ達のこのレビュー https://t.co/lcpaopyBEd から始まって、このエディトリアル https://t.co/veByzczEbr に飛ぶ、「自閉スペクトラム症」概念を研究に使うのはそろそろ諦めた方がよいんじゃないのか、という議論は……
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: As per Gillberg et al: https://t.co/IlY5vKMcAp https://t.co/i4rqZD04dF
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: As per Gillberg et al: https://t.co/IlY5vKMcAp https://t.co/i4rqZD04dF
RT @rb_palomo: Análisis sobre la Validez del constructo TEA (en inglés y gratis) https://t.co/HHy2Zeg5FS
RT @rb_palomo: Análisis sobre la Validez del constructo TEA (en inglés y gratis) https://t.co/HHy2Zeg5FS
Análisis sobre la Validez del constructo TEA (en inglés y gratis) https://t.co/HHy2Zeg5FS
RT @GillbergCentre: Gillberg and co's new paper on ASD validity. https://t.co/b4DDSdbBc7
RT @GillbergCentre: Gillberg and co's new paper on ASD validity. https://t.co/b4DDSdbBc7
RT @GillbergCentre: Gillberg and co's new paper on ASD validity. https://t.co/b4DDSdbBc7
Gillberg and co's new paper on ASD validity. https://t.co/b4DDSdbBc7
RT @autismideasfail: Clinical coverage sustains belief in the @autism diagnosis, but ASD dx lacks neurobiological and construct validity h…
ASD Validity https://t.co/gmZGWBJZB4
RT @autismideasfail: The FB page Taking Autism APART is at https://t.co/PhGEG8iq4J Our @ASD Validity paper https://t.co/wuyW450i3d be reque…
The FB page Taking Autism APART is at https://t.co/PhGEG8iq4J Our @ASD Validity paper https://t.co/wuyW450i3d be requested at this FB page.
RT @richardmills18: #ASD Validity - listen to Christopher Gillberg at @ResearchAutism Autism conference Manchester 19 Oct #Autism #DSM5 htt…
RT @autismideasfail: Clinical coverage sustains belief in the @autism diagnosis, but ASD dx lacks neurobiological and construct validity h…
A critical evaluation of the biological validity of "ASD" and its implications for research #springerlink https://t.co/puPyz4v40X
@autism_research ASD Validity does not have genetic risk factors that converge on just a few brain pathways/circuits https://t.co/wuyW44IHbF
@ ASD diagnostic criteria = just 2 of an individual's symptoms--thus dx does not define a valid disorder or spectrum https://t.co/wuyW450i3d
Clinical coverage sustains belief in the @autism diagnosis, but ASD dx lacks neurobiological and construct validity https://t.co/wuyW450i3d
RT @richardmills18: #ASD Validity - listen to Christopher Gillberg at @ResearchAutism Autism conference Manchester 19 Oct #Autism #DSM5 htt…
RT @ABA4ALL_UK: New research: autism too diverse, needs parsing into individualised research/therapies. ABA individualises already https:/…
RT @richardmills18: #ASD diagnosis? Chris Gillberg #Manchester 19 Oct @ResearchAutism https://t.co/CipIgeM11g by Norton Identity Safe http…
RT @ABA4ALL_UK: New research: autism too diverse, needs parsing into individualised research/therapies. ABA individualises already https:/…
New research: autism too diverse, needs parsing into individualised research/therapies. ABA individualises already https://t.co/bioDMWXsPj
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: Brood at softplay. Me reading the quite remarkable paper by Waterhouse and colleagues on autism validity yet again.. h…
RT @PaulWhiteleyPhD: Brood at softplay. Me reading the quite remarkable paper by Waterhouse and colleagues on autism validity yet again.. h…