The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Clinical presentations, management outcomes, and diagnostic dilemma in Kocuria endophthalmitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12348-018-0163-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vivek Pravin Dave, Joveeta Joseph, Avinash Pathengay, Rajeev R. Pappuru |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#41
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,217
of 438,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.