↓ Skip to main content

Automated 3D scoring of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a confocal whole slide imaging scanner

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microscopy, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Automated 3D scoring of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a confocal whole slide imaging scanner
Published in
Applied Microscopy, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42649-021-00053-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ziv Frankenstein, Naohiro Uraoka, Umut Aypar, Ruth Aryeequaye, Mamta Rao, Meera Hameed, Yanming Zhang, Yukako Yagi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microscopy
#21
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,359
of 454,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microscopy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them