↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Criticality in Neuronal Avalanches: I. A Theoretical Investigation of the Non-driven Case

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Identification of Criticality in Neuronal Avalanches: I. A Theoretical Investigation of the Non-driven Case
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/2190-8567-3-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy J Taylor, Caroline Hartley, Péter L Simon, Istvan Z Kiss, Luc Berthouze

Abstract

In this paper, we study a simple model of a purely excitatory neural network that, by construction, operates at a critical point. This model allows us to consider various markers of criticality and illustrate how they should perform in a finite-size system. By calculating the exact distribution of avalanche sizes, we are able to show that, over a limited range of avalanche sizes which we precisely identify, the distribution has scale free properties but is not a power law. This suggests that it would be inappropriate to dismiss a system as not being critical purely based on an inability to rigorously fit a power law distribution as has been recently advocated. In assessing whether a system, especially a finite-size one, is critical it is thus important to consider other possible markers. We illustrate one of these by showing the divergence of susceptibility as the critical point of the system is approached. Finally, we provide evidence that power laws may underlie other observables of the system that may be more amenable to robust experimental assessment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 26%
Engineering 4 12%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Mathematics 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,737,203
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#34
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,499
of 195,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.