↓ Skip to main content

Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and classification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 1979
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1975 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1078 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and classification
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf01531288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorna Wing, Judith Gould

Abstract

The prevalence, in children aged under 15, of severe impairments of social interaction, language abnormalities, and repetitive stereotyped behaviors was investigated in an area of London. A "socially impaired" group (more than half of whom were severely retarded) and a comparison group of "sociable severely mentally retarded" children were identified. Mutism or echolalia, and repetitive stereotyped behaviors were found in almost all the socially impaired children, but to a less marked extent in a minority of the sociable severely retarded. Certain organic conditions were found more often in the socially impaired group. A subgroup with a history of Kanner's early childhood autism could be identified reliably but shared many abnormalities with other socially impaired children. The relationships between mental retardation, typical autism, and other conditions involving social impairment were discussed, and a system of classification based on quality of social interaction was considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,078 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 18 2%
United States 8 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1034 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 183 17%
Student > Bachelor 164 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 163 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 91 8%
Student > Postgraduate 65 6%
Other 185 17%
Unknown 227 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 366 34%
Social Sciences 105 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 4%
Neuroscience 42 4%
Other 183 17%
Unknown 254 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,236,320
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#442
of 5,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 5,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them