↓ Skip to main content

Team-based instructional change in undergraduate STEM: characterizing effective faculty collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Team-based instructional change in undergraduate STEM: characterizing effective faculty collaboration
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40594-021-00273-4
Authors

Diana Sachmpazidi, Alice Olmstead, Amreen Nasim Thompson, Charles Henderson, Andrea Beach

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 41 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 12%
Chemistry 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 44 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#20,701,376
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#344
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,917
of 431,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.