↓ Skip to main content

The role of analytical reasoning and source credibility on the evaluation of real and fake full-length news articles

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
The role of analytical reasoning and source credibility on the evaluation of real and fake full-length news articles
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41235-021-00292-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Didem Pehlivanoglu, Tian Lin, Farha Deceus, Amber Heemskerk, Natalie C. Ebner, Brian S. Cahill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 4 4%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 34 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 22%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Computer Science 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 35 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,789,382
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#158
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,686
of 431,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.