| Title |
The role of analytical reasoning and source credibility on the evaluation of real and fake full-length news articles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41235-021-00292-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Didem Pehlivanoglu, Tian Lin, Farha Deceus, Amber Heemskerk, Natalie C. Ebner, Brian S. Cahill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,324,033
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#173
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,467
of 454,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.