| Title |
Development and promotion in translational medicine: perspectives from 2012 sino‐american symposium on clinical and translational medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2001-1326-1-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mengjia Qian, Duojiao Wu, Ena Wang, Francesco M Marincola, Wei Wang, William Rhodes, Michael Liebman, Chunxue Bai, Ching-Wan Lam, Gyorgy Marko-Varga, Thomas E Fehniger, Roland Andersson, Xiangdong Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#851
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,530
of 202,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.