Title |
Should less motion sensitive T2-weighted BLADE TSE replace Cartesian TSE for female pelvic MRI?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Insights into Imaging, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13244-012-0193-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johannes M. Froehlich, Thierry Metens, Bianka Chilla, Nik Hauser, Markus Klarhoefer, Rahel A. Kubik-Huch |
Abstract |
To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of a non-Cartesian k-space sampling T2-weighted TSE BLADE sequence with a conventional T2-weighted TSE sequence in female pelvic organs. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 52% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#21,699,788
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#946
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,952
of 174,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.