↓ Skip to main content

Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Authors

Kevin A. Nguyen, Maura Borrego, Cynthia J. Finelli, Matt DeMonbrun, Caroline Crockett, Sneha Tharayil, Prateek Shekhar, Cynthia Waters, Robyn Rosenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 231 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Lecturer 17 7%
Student > Master 16 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 4%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 113 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 9%
Engineering 15 6%
Computer Science 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 7 3%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 57 25%
Unknown 117 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,026,342
of 24,616,908 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#157
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,030
of 428,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,616,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.