↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial culture after three sterilization methods for cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Bacterial culture after three sterilization methods for cataract surgery
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10384-012-0201-0
Authors

Keiji Inagaki, Tatsuo Yamaguchi, Sachiko Ohde, Gautam A. Deshpande, Kazukuni Kakinoki, Kishiko Ohkoshi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2012.
All research outputs
#2,903,575
of 3,628,445 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#63
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,536
of 78,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.