↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the performance gap between testing on real and denoised aggregates in non-intrusive load monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Energy Informatics, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Investigating the performance gap between testing on real and denoised aggregates in non-intrusive load monitoring
Published in
Energy Informatics, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42162-021-00137-9
Authors

Christoph Klemenjak, Stephen Makonin, Wilfried Elmenreich

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 22%
Energy 4 17%
Computer Science 2 9%
Unknown 12 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Energy Informatics
#15
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,307
of 421,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy Informatics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them