↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: An efficient hybrid model for thermal analysis of deep borehole heat exchangers

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: An efficient hybrid model for thermal analysis of deep borehole heat exchangers
Published in
Geothermal Energy, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40517-021-00191-2
Authors

Yazhou Zhao, Zhonghe Pang, Yonghui Huang, Zhibo Ma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,790,452
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#112
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,418
of 418,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.