↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of geographical locations and sociocultural traits on the Vietnamese entrepreneurship

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Impacts of geographical locations and sociocultural traits on the Vietnamese entrepreneurship
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2850-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quan Hoang Vuong

Abstract

This paper presents new results obtained from investigating the data from a 2015 Vietnamese entrepreneurs' survey, containing 3071 observations. Evidence from the estimations using multinomial logits was found to support relationships between several sociocultural factors and entrepreneurship-related performance or traits. Specifically, those relationships include: (a) Active participation in entrepreneurs' social networks and reported value of creativity; (b) CSR-willingness and reported entrepreneurs' perseverance; (c) Transforming of sociocultural values and entrepreneurs' decisiveness; and, (d) Lessons learned from others' failures and perceived chance of success. Using geographical locations as the control variate, evaluations of the baseline-category logits models indicate their varying effects on the outcomes when combined with the sociocultural factors that are found to be statistically significant. Empirical probabilities that give further detail about behavioral patterns are provided; and toward the end, the paper offers some conclusions with some striking insights and useful explanations on the Vietnamese entrepreneurship processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 11 28%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Design 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,083,800
of 23,628,742 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#431
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,735
of 368,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#69
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,628,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.