↓ Skip to main content

Traumatic injuries of thigh and calf muscles in athletes: role and clinical relevance of MR imaging and ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Traumatic injuries of thigh and calf muscles in athletes: role and clinical relevance of MR imaging and ultrasound
Published in
Insights into Imaging, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13244-012-0190-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daichi Hayashi, Bruce Hamilton, Ali Guermazi, Richard de Villiers, Michel D. Crema, Frank W. Roemer

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and ultrasound have become valuable tools for evaluation of traumatic muscle injuries in athletes. Common athletic injuries include strain, contusion and avulsion, which are characterised by muscle fibre disruption, intramuscular haemorrhagic dissection, haematoma at the musculotendinous junction, and perifascial blood or haematoma.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Sports and Recreations 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#847
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,285
of 154,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.