↓ Skip to main content

Track-before-detect in distributed sensor applications

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Track-before-detect in distributed sensor applications
Published in
ADS, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1687-6180-2011-20
Authors

Felix Govaers, Yang Rong, Lai Hoe Chee, Wolfgang Koch, Teow Loo Nin, Ng Gee Wah

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 29%
Engineering 2 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,327
of 25,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,664
of 128,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#27
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.