Title |
The relationship between quantitative measures of disc height and disc signal intensity with Pfirrmann score of disc degeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-2542-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sara Salamat, John Hutchings, Clemens Kwong, John Magnussen, Mark J. Hancock |
Abstract |
To assess the relationship between quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity with the Pfirrmann disc degeneration scoring system and to test the inter-rater reliability of the quantitative measures. Participants were 76 people who had recently recovered from their last episode of acute low back pain and underwent MRI scan on a single 3T machine. At all 380 lumbar discs, quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity were made by 2 independent raters and compared to Pfirrmann scores from a single radiologist. For quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity a "raw" score and 2 adjusted ratios were calculated and the relationship with Pfirrmann scores was assessed. The inter-tester reliability of quantitative measures was also investigated. There was a strong linear relationship between quantitative disc signal intensity and Pfirrmann scores for grades 1-4, but not for grades 4 and 5. For disc height only, Pfirrmann grade 5 had significantly reduced disc height compared to all other grades. Results were similar regardless of whether raw or adjusted scores were used. Inter-rater reliability for the quantitative measures was excellent (ICC > 0.97). Quantitative measures of disc signal intensity were strongly related to Pfirrmann scores from grade 1 to 4; however disc height only differentiated between grade 4 and 5 Pfirrmann scores. Using adjusted ratios for quantitative measures of disc height or signal intensity did not significantly alter the relationship with Pfirrmann scores. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 32% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |