| Title |
A multi-purpose National Forest Inventory in Bangladesh: design, operationalisation and key results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forest Ecosystems, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40663-021-00284-1 |
| Authors |
Matieu Henry, Zaheer Iqbal, Kristofer Johnson, Mariam Akhter, Liam Costello, Charles Scott, Rashed Jalal, Md. Akhter Hossain, Nikhil Chakma, Olaf Kuegler, Hossain Mahmood, Rajib Mahamud, Mohammad Raqibul Hasan Siddique, Khaled Misbahuzzaman, Mohammad Main Uddin, Mohammed Al Amin, Farid Uddin Ahmed, Gael Sola, Md. Baktiar Siddiqui, Luca Birigazzi, Mahmudur Rahman, Ilias Animon, Saimunnahar Ritu, Laskar Muqsudur Rahman, Aminul Islam, Heather Hayden, Frida Sidik, Mondal Falgoonee Kumar, Rakibul Hassan Mukul, Hossain Nishad, Ariful Hoque Belal, Asif Reza Anik, Abdul Khaleque, Md. Shaheduzzaman, Syed Shahadat Hossain, Tariq Aziz, Md. Tauhidor Rahaman, Ruhul Mohaiman, Patrick Meyer, Purnata Chakma, A. Z. M. Manzoor Rashid, Sourav Das, Shrabanti Hira, Mohammed Jashimuddin, Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman, Karl Wurster, Sarder Nasir Uddin, Abul Kalam Azad, S. M. Zahirul Islam, Laurent Saint-André |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 10% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,329,122
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#51
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,504
of 540,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 540,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.