| Title |
Defect Formation Mechanisms in Selective Laser Melting: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10033-017-0121-5 |
| Authors |
Bi Zhang, Yongtao Li, Qian Bai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,032 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1032 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 228 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 167 | 16% |
| Researcher | 94 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 4% |
| Other | 85 | 8% |
| Unknown | 348 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 373 | 36% |
| Materials Science | 178 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 7 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 34 | 3% |
| Unknown | 419 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,825,908
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
#9
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,999
of 310,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them